“Let me check who these people are first.”
A cited mention on the category page says you’re an established name, not a pitch.
Takes you seriouslyfrom $690Wikipedia mention
Be the on the page AI reads first.
A properly sourced citation on the Wikipedia article that already covers your category. Disclosed, done by Wikipedia’s rules, and paid for only once it’s accepted.
4.7 on TrustpilotPay on acceptanceFree citability audit90-day revert watch
What a citation that lasts is made of
Citability auditIndependent sourcesTalk-page requestsDeclared interestWikidataKnowledge panelAI answers90-day revert watch
Before they trust you, they look you up.
Journalists, investors, buyers and AI assistants all reach for the same reference page. If your category has an article and you’re not in it, that silence speaks for you.
“Are they real, or just loud?”
Independent sources on the reference page read as proof, not marketing.
Keeps reading“Who are the main providers in this space?”
Assistants and knowledge panels lean hard on Wikipedia when they describe a category.
Has you to nameYou can’t buy your way onto Wikipedia. You can be sourced onto it, properly.
Not a sneaky edit. A citation built to last.
Most brand edits on Wikipedia get reverted for the same five reasons. Here is how ours differ.
Typical Wikipedia editsWith Dot Mirror
The sourcesYour own site and press releasesIndependent, secondary coverage
DisclosureHidden paid editingDeclared, as Wikipedia requires
The routeDirect edits that promote youTalk-page requests where proper
If it’s revertedGone, and so is the feeRe-placed or refunded in 90 days
When you payUp front, win or loseOnly once it’s accepted
Why brands trust us with Wikipedia
Pay on acceptance
A reverted edit is worth nothing, so the fee is due when the citation is live, not when work starts.
The truth, up front
If independent coverage of you doesn’t exist yet, we tell you before you spend a cent.
Watched after it lands
We watchlist the article. If the edit is reverted inside 90 days, we re-place it or refund you.
An entity signal, not a link
Every Wikipedia link is nofollow. The value is how the page describes you to Google and AI.
One sentence, one source, done by the rules.
What your citation looks like on the page, how it gets there, and the rules it has to pass. Wikipedia’s volunteer editors make the final call.
Your Category
SampleMarket
Providers in the segment are usually grouped by deployment model.[1] Notable providers include Competitor A, Competitor B and Your Brand.[2] Most offer monthly plans priced per user.
References
- ^ “An overview of the segment.” An industry analysis firm. 2025.
- ^ “Article about Your Brand.” An independent trade publication. 2026.
Talk: Your CategorySample
Edit request · declared paid editor
Proposed: add Your Brand to the list of notable providers, citing an independent trade publication (2026).
Disclosure: this request is made on behalf of Your Brand, who pays for it.
A volunteer editorReviewed against the sourcesAccepted
After it’s accepted
Reverted inside 90 days? We re-place it or refund you. After that, like every edit on Wikipedia, it stays for as long as editors agree it belongs.
WP:NNotabilityIndependent coverage of you must already exist.WP:RSReliable sourcesSecondary, published, independent of you.WP:COIConflict of interestA talk-page request where a direct edit would be improper.WP:PAIDPaid disclosureWho pays is always declared, as the terms require.
One sourced sentence. Read everywhere it is copied.
Google ranks Wikipedia near the top for almost any category, and AI assistants lean on it as a source. A citation there travels. Type your brand to see it.
Sample results. Type your brand to see it in place.
01 · The category search
The page that ranks for your category names you.
- Wikipedia ranks near the top for most category searches
- Your brand named in the article, backed by an independent source
- Readers comparing providers see you in the same sentence
Illustrations. Wikipedia's volunteer editors decide what stays, and no one can promise what Google or an AI assistant will show.
Pay when it’s live. Not before.
Quoted per accepted citation. Nothing is due until the edit is live.
Citation
One reference on an existing articleThe solid first step: your source on the page.
$690per accepted citation
- Free citability audit
- Article and claim agreed with you
- Independent sources supplied
- Talk-page route where required
- 90-day watchlist
- Re-placed if reverted
Brand Mention
Named in the body, with the referenceNamed where readers look, with your Wikidata checked.
$1,190per accepted mention
- Everything in Citation
- Brand named in article text
- Supporting reference formatted
- Wikidata entry checked and corrected
- 90-day watchlist
- Re-placed if reverted
New Article
Where notability is already evidencedQuoted only after a notability assessment.
From$8,000per article
- Notability assessment first
- Drafted to WP:RS and WP:N
- Full independent source set
- Declared-interest submission
- Wikidata item created
- 6 months of monitoring
Not citable yet?
Coverage comes first.
If the audit finds too little independent coverage, the honest next step is press and editorial work. We can plan that with you, then come back to Wikipedia.
- Reply within 24 hours
- A quote built for your volume
- No call required
Talk about coverage first A real person replies, not a bot
The audit runs first and is free. If your coverage will not support a citation yet we will tell you, and there is nothing to pay. Page creation is quoted only where notability is already evidenced by independent sources.
From “are we citable?” to a live reference.
- Before you pay
Citability audit
We check for independent coverage Wikipedia accepts. No coverage, no invoice.
- Agreed with you
Pick the article
The article that covers your category, and the exact sentence you can support.
- Edit or request
Source and submit
A reference from independent sources, added directly or through a talk-page request.
- 90-day watch
Watch and report
The article URL, the diff and the sources, then 90 days on our watchlist.
A citation, not a vanity page.
Specimens of the deliverable. Your report has the article URL, the diff, and every source used.
Reference added to the market-structure section
Providers in the segment are typically categorised by deployment model, according to industry analysis.
Brand added to the list of active providers
Entry carries the brand name in the article body with a cited trade-press reference supporting it.
Entity created and linked to the article
Official site, founding date and category fields populated and cross-referenced.
For brands the press already writes about.
Brands with press coverage and no Wikipedia footprint
You have been written about in real publications. That is the raw material a citation needs, and it is currently doing nothing for your entity.
Anyone working on a knowledge panel
Wikipedia and Wikidata are the two sources Google leans on hardest. A citation is usually the missing corroboration.
Companies being evaluated by AI assistants
If a model has nothing authoritative to retrieve about you, it will describe your competitors instead.
Founders and executives building a public profile
A cited mention in an article about the field is often more attainable than a page of your own, and does most of the same work.
Brands now described the way they should be.
Completely risk free
90-day money-back guarantee
- If a link is removed inside 90 days, we replace it.
- If we cannot replace it, you are refunded in full. No arguing about it.
- If you resold it, you hear about the replacement before your client notices the link is gone.
Questions about Wikipedia
No. Every external link on Wikipedia is nofollow and has been for years. Anyone selling you a Wikipedia link on the basis of passing PageRank is either misinformed or hoping you are. The value is that the citation describes your brand on the page knowledge panels, Wikidata and AI assistants all read.
Nobody can guarantee a Wikipedia edit, because any editor can revert it. What we can do is make edits that are properly sourced and properly disclosed, which is what survives, and watchlist the article for 90 days. If it is reverted inside that window we re-place it or refund you.
Then we tell you before you pay. The audit checks whether independent coverage exists in sources Wikipedia treats as reliable. Where it does not, a citation is not available at any price, and the honest next step is press and editorial work first.
Paid editing is permitted where it is disclosed, and undisclosed paid editing is not. We work to that line: declared interest, talk-page edit requests where a direct edit would be improper, and claims backed by independent secondary sources. Services that ignore this are why so many brand edits get reverted.
A knowledge panel is the outcome; a Wikipedia citation is one of the strongest inputs to it. If you are chasing a panel, this and consistent structured data are usually the two things missing. Run the free entity check first if you are not sure which you need.
Only where notability is already evidenced by independent coverage. Where it is, we quote it. Where it is not, a submitted draft gets declined and you have paid for a rejection, which is why we assess before quoting rather than after.
It can. Wikipedia is one of the sources AI assistants and Google's knowledge panels lean on most when they describe a company or a category, so a properly sourced mention gives them something authoritative to repeat. Nobody controls what an assistant says, so we don't promise a specific answer.
Your next step
Find out if you’re citable, for free.
We check your independent coverage against Wikipedia’s rules and tell you straight. If you’re ready, you only pay once the citation is live.
$690Per accepted citation
90 daysRevert watch
FreeCitability audit
- Run the free auditWe check your independent coverage.
- Agree the articleAnd the exact claim you can support.
- Pay when it’s liveWith the URL, the diff and the sources.